Best US States for Data Analysts
All 50 states + DC ranked by Data Analyst salary. State tax structure noted for take-home math.
| # | State | Estimated salary | Cost mult. | State tax |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California | $102,500 | 1.18× | ~5% effective |
| 2 | Washington | $98,300 | 1.10× | No state tax |
| 3 | Hawaii | $96,400 | 1.15× | ~5% effective |
| 4 | Colorado | $95,800 | 1.05× | ~5% effective |
| 5 | Massachusetts | $94,900 | 1.12× | ~5% effective |
| 6 | Arizona | $93,200 | 1.00× | ~5% effective |
| 7 | District of Columbia | $93,200 | 1.20× | ~5% effective |
| 8 | Maryland | $93,000 | 1.08× | ~5% effective |
| 9 | Oregon | $91,500 | 1.05× | ~5% effective |
| 10 | New York | $90,900 | 1.15× | ~5% effective |
| # | State | Salary | After state tax (rough) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California | $102,500 | $75,184 |
| 2 | Washington | $98,300 | $77,018 |
| 3 | Hawaii | $96,400 | $70,709 |
| 4 | Colorado | $95,800 | $70,269 |
| 5 | Massachusetts | $94,900 | $69,609 |
| 6 | Arizona | $93,200 | $68,362 |
| 7 | District of Columbia | $93,200 | $68,362 |
| 8 | Maryland | $93,000 | $68,216 |
| 9 | Oregon | $91,500 | $67,115 |
| 10 | New York | $90,900 | $66,675 |
| 11 | Alaska | $90,000 | $70,515 |
| 12 | New Jersey | $90,000 | $66,015 |
| 13 | Idaho | $89,700 | $65,795 |
| 14 | Wisconsin | $89,700 | $65,795 |
| 15 | New Mexico | $89,100 | $65,355 |
| 16 | Connecticut | $88,600 | $64,988 |
| 17 | Pennsylvania | $87,600 | $64,255 |
| 18 | Texas | $87,600 | $68,635 |
| 19 | Utah | $87,600 | $64,255 |
| 20 | New Hampshire | $86,300 | $67,616 |
| 21 | Rhode Island | $85,400 | $62,641 |
| 22 | Virginia | $85,400 | $62,641 |
| 23 | South Carolina | $85,100 | $62,421 |
| 24 | Nevada | $84,900 | $66,519 |
| 25 | Kansas | $84,600 | $62,054 |
| 26 | Missouri | $84,200 | $61,761 |
| 27 | Delaware | $84,000 | $61,614 |
| 28 | Florida | $84,000 | $65,814 |
| 29 | Illinois | $84,000 | $61,614 |
| 30 | Minnesota | $84,000 | $61,614 |
| 31 | Vermont | $83,500 | $61,247 |
| 32 | Alabama | $83,200 | $61,027 |
| 33 | Oklahoma | $83,200 | $61,027 |
| 34 | Maine | $82,600 | $60,587 |
| 35 | Georgia | $81,200 | $59,560 |
| 36 | North Carolina | $81,200 | $59,560 |
| 37 | Michigan | $80,800 | $59,267 |
| 38 | Montana | $80,800 | $59,267 |
| 39 | Wyoming | $80,800 | $63,307 |
| 40 | North Dakota | $80,300 | $58,900 |
| 41 | Tennessee | $80,300 | $62,915 |
| 42 | Indiana | $79,800 | $58,533 |
| 43 | Nebraska | $79,800 | $58,533 |
| 44 | Ohio | $79,800 | $58,533 |
| 45 | South Dakota | $79,800 | $62,523 |
| 46 | Iowa | $79,400 | $58,240 |
| 47 | Louisiana | $79,400 | $58,240 |
| 48 | Kentucky | $78,500 | $57,580 |
| 49 | Arkansas | $77,500 | $56,846 |
| 50 | West Virginia | $77,500 | $56,846 |
| 51 | Mississippi | $76,600 | $56,186 |
What moves with you and what does not
Data Analyst does not require state licensure, so nothing formal stops you working in any state on this list. Where pay differences persist, they reflect employer concentration and cost of living rather than a regulatory barrier — which also means they compress faster than they do in licensed fields.
Tax and what the numbers are worth
Income tax reshuffles this ranking. Washington appears in the top ten and levies no state income tax, so the gross figures understate take-home there by roughly 3–6% relative to a taxing state at the same salary. Against a high-tax state, that is worth several thousand dollars a year at this occupation's median of $84,000.
The offset is usually property tax. States without an income tax recover the revenue elsewhere, so the advantage is largest for renters and narrows considerably for homeowners. Run both if you plan to buy.
The spread from Mississippi ($76,600) to California ($102,500) is 34%. Cost of living explains most of it — a state paying 25% above the national median for this role usually costs proportionally more to live in, which is why cost-adjusted rankings look different from nominal ones.
Where the field is heading
Nationally, Data Analyst employment is projected to grow strongly — 23% through 2034, with roughly 19,800 openings a year counting replacements. Growth is rarely evenly distributed: states with the industry concentration driving that growth will feel it first, and the ranking above is a reasonable proxy for where.
Salaries are modelled from BLS national medians adjusted for local price level at a wage elasticity below 1 — pay rises with local costs but not proportionally. See our methodology.